For organisations
An acquisition, a market to enter, a system to replace. Most of the argument is about the few things nobody actually knows yet. SwingFactor finds them, shows which of them could change the answer, and keeps a record of what everyone believed when the choice was made. Questions stay private to your workspace, and everyone who needs to be in it can be — plans are priced by questions, not seats.
The question, taken apart
A decision is broken into the statements whose truth would change which option you prefer. Each is judged on its own terms — what kind of claim it is, how well it stands up, how strong its evidence is — and those judgements are never merged into one score.
The uncertainties that swing it
Dependencies show what else moves when one thing does. Where people disagree about a number, each range is kept apart rather than averaged, and the switch point — where the preferred option changes — is marked. This part is computed, not generated: the same accepted model gives the same answer every time.
SwingFactor proposes; you accept
SwingFactor drafts the options, propositions, evidence from your own sources and from research, dependencies and numbers, then reviews its own work as a sceptic would. Everything it writes arrives as a proposal, and nothing counts until a person has accepted it.
Decisions you can look back on
Every change is kept with who made it, when and why. Freeze the model under a name, compare two snapshots item by item, and record the decision against the snapshot it was made on — so what you knew at the time is read from the record, not remembered.
Seven days free on Investigator or Institute. Bring the question you are least sure of.